Home Blog Page 2

Lush boycots Facebook, Insta, TikTok and Snapchat for security reasons

0

Cosmetics retailer Lush is boycotting numerous social media platforms over user safety concerns.

The brand, which previously criticized the platforms, confirmed it will turn its back on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and Snapchat from Friday.

He said he would stay out of the platforms “until they take action to provide a more secure environment for users.”

The company said it had “finally had enough” following allegations by Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen about the action of the social media giants.

Lush has said he will roll out the policy in the 48 countries where he operates.

In a statement, the company said, “At Lush, we don’t want to wait for better global regulations or platforms to introduce best practice guidelines, as a generation of young people grow up and suffer serious and lasting damage.

“Now is a good time to find better ways to connect without putting our customers at risk.

“It’s not enough for companies to stop placing paid advertising; people and their time are the currency of these channels and we don’t want our content to be used by hidden algorithms designed to keep people captive on a channel.

The company said it would “not be anti-social” and would still use certain platforms, including Twitter and YouTube, to stay in touch with its customers.

Lush said he hopes business action can help encourage platforms to introduce strong best practice guidelines and that international regulations will be enacted into law.

Jack Constantine, Chief Digital Officer and Product Inventor at Lush, said: “We feel compelled to take our own steps to protect our customers from the damage and manipulation they may experience when trying to connect with us over the networks. social.

“I have spent my entire life avoiding harmful ingredients in my products. There is now overwhelming evidence that we are put at risk when we use social media.

“I’m unwilling to expose my clients to this harm, so it’s time to take it out of the mix. “


Source link

NHS migrant tax system ‘not working’ – report

0

The NHS pricing system for migrants is “inadequate,” a think tank said.

Pricing rules “deter people from accessing health care, cause treatment delays, distract NHS professionals from their care roles and charge patients large bills with no prospect of paying them”, according to a report from the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR).

He said the system for billing migrants for health care in England has become “increasingly stringent” in recent years.

The latest IPPR report points out that anyone who is not ‘ordinarily resident’ in the UK is charged 150% of the national NHS rate for hospital care, unless certain exemptions apply.

The IPPR said the main groups affected by these rules are non-EU short-term visitors and people living in England without immigration status.

The authors of the report wrote: ‘The current NHS billing system is not working. As it stands, billing rules deter people from accessing healthcare, cause treatment delays, distract NHS professionals from their care roles, and apply large bills to patients without any prospect of pay them. “

A change in the definition of “ordinary residence” to one that includes all residents regardless of their immigration status would help improve the current system, they concluded.

It would be “the most effective alternative to the current system,” the authors said, adding that it could “reduce delays in treatment, improve medical outcomes and ultimately help fulfill the UK’s commitment to health coverage for all “.

Marley Morris, Associate Director of IPPR, said: “The current NHS billing system in England is inadequate. Under these rules, many long-term residents face exorbitant bills for receiving critical treatment. These rules are debilitating for patients, stressful for doctors and nurses, and harmful to public health.

“Our proposals would ensure that all residents, regardless of their immigration status, can access free secondary health care at the point of use, provided they are not a short-term visitor.”

For more stories about where you live, visit InYourZone.


Source link

Rising COVID-19 cases: 7-day state average exceeds 6,000 per day; Blair’s peak prompts Nason to limit visits | Local News

0

JOHNSTOWN, Pennsylvania – The state’s seven-day moving average of COVID-19 cases exceeded 6,000 cases per day on Monday for the first time since January 19.

There were 17,445 new positives over the weekend, the Pennsylvania Department of Health’s Monday update showed, with 6,424 reported on Saturday, 5,417 reported on Sunday and 5,604 reported on Monday.

This brings the seven-day average to 6,213 cases per day.

106 more deaths were recorded over the three days, bringing Pennsylvania’s total to 1,691,773 cases and 32,931 deaths attributed to COVID-19 since the pandemic struck last year.

Two counties in the region have reached questionable milestones, with Blair County exceeding 20,000 cases in total and Westmoreland County exceeding 50,000 cases.

Blair added a total of 365 cases to reach 20,045 and Westmoreland added 853 cases to reach 50,074.

Visit of Nason

The 127 new Blair cases added on Monday marked the county’s fifth consecutive triple-digit increase.

The latest increase prompted Conemaugh Health System to announce new visitation limits for Conemaugh Nason Medical Center in Blair County.

Starting Tuesday, patients in most areas of the hospital, including the intensive care unit, will be limited to one visitor from noon to 8 p.m. per day.

Children under 18 may be accompanied by a parent during their stay.

During labor and delivery, a support person is allowed throughout the stay, but no other visitors are allowed.

A support person is allowed to accompany patients in the emergency department and patients with outpatient procedures who need help may have a support person.

End-of-life and other situations where the well-being of a patient is supported will be approved by the attending physician in coordination with the staff.

Cambria County added 269 cases over the three days, Somerset County added 148 cases, Bedford County added 93 cases, Indiana County added 212, Clearfield County added 116 and the Center County added 218 cases.

Westmoreland had six new deaths; Bedford, Clearfield and Center had two each; and Cambria, Blair and Indiana each had one death.

The state praises the blows

The Department of Health has stressed that COVID-19 vaccines are the best defense against serious illness and death from the virus.

“Data shows that COVID-19 vaccines are very effective in preventing hospitalizations and deaths, although more post-vaccination cases are occurring against the background of more communicable variants and more residents getting vaccinated,” said the department on its website.

The report presented data collected between January 1 and November 2 showing that 88% of COVID-19 cases, 90% of hospitalizations and 89% of deaths from COVID-19 were in people who were unvaccinated or not fully vaccinated.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports that 73.6% of adults in Pennsylvania are fully immunized.

The combination of Monday’s reports from the state and Philadelphia health departments shows that there are now 7,580,790 fully vaccinated Pennsylvanians. Vaccinators administered 17,345,298 doses, including 1,473,351 boosters.

Randy Griffith is a multimedia reporter for The Tribune-Democrat. He can be reached at 532-5057. Follow him on twitter @ PhotoGriffer57.



Source link

Over 5,000 houses in England approved for construction in flood-prone areas | Lodging

0

More than 5,000 new homes in flood-risk areas of England have been granted building permits so far this year as local authorities try to tackle the housing shortage.

Researchers analyzing 16,000 planning applications filed between January and September found that around 200 had been approved, for a total of 5,283 new homes, in areas where more than 10% of homes were already at significant risk. flood.

Insurers have expressed concern about the number of homes under construction where homeowners are at risk of “traumatic and devastating losses.”

But builders said the need for new homes meant even areas at risk of flooding would have to be used – and with the climate crisis leaving more homes exposed, more defenses and mitigation measures would need to be put in place. .

Martin Milliner, claims manager at LV = General Insurance, who commissioned the report, said: “While we welcome the government‘s commitment to increase housing, we are concerned about the UK’s resilience to future flooding, and in particular the number of new real estate developments. in flood-prone areas undergoing approval.

“Floods are an extremely traumatic event that has a devastating impact on a person’s life, both physically and mentally. “

Andrew Whitaker, Planning Director at the Home Builders Federation, said: “We are facing an acute housing crisis. The development policy is already orienting development away from the areas most exposed to flooding.

“However, when there is no other choice, or sites located in areas at high risk of flooding are the most sustainable sites for other reasons, developments must meet the requirements of ‘extremely strict mitigation. “

Local Government Association for Housing and Environment spokesperson David Renard said nearly 99% of applications were decided in accordance with the Environment Agency’s advice on flood risks.

He added: “Funding for flood defenses must be devolved to local areas to ensure that the money is directed to projects that best reflect local needs. The government is also to introduce mandatory anti-flood requirements for new homes into building regulations. “

Sign up for the daily Business Today email or follow Guardian Business on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

A survey by Greenpeace this year found that a third of England’s largest flood defenses were in private hands, with more than 1,000 in poor condition.

More than 5 million homes and businesses in England are at risk of flooding, according to Environment Agency estimates.

The government said it was investing more than £ 5.2 billion in flood and coastal defense in England, which would improve protection for more than 336,000 properties.

A spokesperson said: “Our national planning policy makes it clear that the development of floodplains should be avoided wherever possible, and protections should be put in place when construction in these areas is needed – we expect local planning authorities that they follow these guidelines. “


Source link

Travelodge to open four new hotels before Christmas

0

Travelodge has announced that four new hotels will open in time for Christmas as bosses hope to take advantage of families who wish to travel during the holiday season.

Two new locations have already opened in London, at Elephant and Castle and Manor House, with another in Walton-on-Thames in Surrey.

The final site is at Cobalt Business Park in Newcastle, with the hotel chain hoping it can help win back business customers with more face-to-face meetings and less remote work.

This means Travelodge will have opened 17 new hotels across the UK in 2021, creating 360 jobs with an investment of £ 175million, bringing it to a total of 595 locations in UK, Ireland and Spain.

The Travelodge at Elephant and Castle is one of four new locations (Travelodge / PA)

Bosses said London hotels are the latest rollout of their more upscale locations, known as ‘budget chic’, where some rooms are bigger as they try to tap into the growing market travelers looking for a little more luxury.

Rival Premier Inn has also launched its own premium economy rooms, with both brands benefiting from the boom in stays during the pandemic.

Craig Bonnar, Managing Director of Travelodge, said: “This year we have opened new Travelodges across the country and many of these new hotel openings have played a central role in regeneration programs across the UK. United.

“Adding a low-cost hotel like Travelodge is an attractive choice because it attracts visitors, creates jobs and helps stimulate the local economy. “

Travelodge is rebuilding the brand after putting in place a voluntary corporate deal last year to cut costs after being hit during the pandemic.

The landlords approved the deal which reduced her rent bill by around £ 144million.


Source link

Jacob Rees-Mogg told the standards watchdog over £ 6million in cheap loans

0

Multimillionaire Leader of the Commons was able to borrow large sums at low interest thanks to loans from directors

Chief of Commons Jacob Rees-Mogg

Labor has called for an investigation into a £ 6million loan which it says was not correctly declared by House of Commons Leader Jacob Rees-Mogg.

On Sunday, Labor deputy chief Angela Rayner wrote to independent advisor for ministers’ interests Lord Geidt about a series of loans to Mr Rees-Mogg’s company, Saliston Limited, between 2018 and 2020.

In her letter she said that failure to report the Director’s loans worth £ 2.94million per year “allowed Mr Rees-Mogg to borrow a large sum of money. at a very low interest rate “.

She added: “The financial benefit for Mr. Rees-Mogg in this transaction is the difference in the interest he paid on this loan versus a loan he could take on the open market from another. supplier, for example a bank.

“In this transaction, that difference is the value of the financial benefit transferred to Mr. Rees-Mogg, which is financial interest that should have been declared.”

Mr Rees-Mogg borrowed up to £ 2.94million per year in ‘director loans’ from his company Saliston Ltd between 2018 and 2020.








Mr Rees-Mogg has borrowed up to £ 2.94million per year in “director loans” from his company Saliston Ltd
(

Picture:

Getty Images)




While it does not specifically identify director loans, the Member’s Code of Conduct requires directors to report “taxable expenses, allowances and benefits.”

The House of Commons leader said he was an “unpaid director” and shareholder in the company, but did not mention that he took out the loans.

Using the principal’s loans, he was able to borrow the large sum at very low interest rates.

UK firm Saliston Ltd has previously been described as a ‘holding company’ by Mr Rees-Mogg, with £ 8million in property assets, including a Mayfair house.

Saliston also owns a stake in Mr. Rees-Mogg’s asset management company, Somerset Capital Management LLP, the offshore parent company of Somerset Capital Management (Cayman) Ltd.

He paid just £ 48,945 in interest to Saliston on £ 6million in three-year loans, a rate of just 0.8%.

The deputy Labor leader and fictitious chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster pointed to an article in the ministerial code which states that “ministers shall ensure that no conflict arises, or can reasonably be perceived to arise, between their public office and their private interests, financial or otherwise “.

After sending the letter, Ms Rayner said: “Jacob Rees-Mogg might think a £ 6million loan is not worth reporting, but the rules apply to him and all other Conservative ministers.

“Boris Johnson and his ministers act like they’re above the rules because they think there is one rule for them and another for the rest of us.



“Labor would stop the rot, overhaul this broken system and establish an independent integrity and ethics commission to root out conservative corruption in our democracy.”

Mr Rees-Mogg has previously defended his use of the loans, which he used to buy a house in Mayfair.

He added that the company, Saliston, is “100% mine” and is declared as such in the register of municipal interests.

In a statement to the Mail on Sunday, which first revealed the history of the loans, he added: “He [Saliston] has no activities that interact with government policy.

“The 2018 loans were mainly contracted for the purchase and renovation of [my home] as temporary cash flow measures.

“All loans were either repaid with interest in accordance with HMRC rules or paid as dividends and taxed accordingly.”


Read more




Read more




Source link

Video of missing Chinese tennis star posted online

0

Missing tennis star Peng Shuai reappeared in public at a youth tournament in Beijing on Sunday, according to photos released by the organizer, as the ruling Communist Party tried to allay fears abroad while suppressing information in China about Peng after she accused a senior leader of sexual assault.

The China Open post on social media service Weibo made no mention of Peng’s disappearance or his accusation.

Peng was shown standing next to a court, waving and signing oversized children’s commemorative tennis balls.

The appearance follows an announcement on Saturday by the editor of a party newspaper on Twitter, which cannot be seen by most internet users in China, that the three-time Olympian will “appear in public” soon.

The ruling party appears to be trying to defuse the alarm over Peng without acknowledging his disappearance, after the former Wimbledon and Paris Open champion this month accused Zhang Gaoli, a member of the ruling party’s standing committee until ‘in 2018, for forcing her to have sex.

Peng’s disappearance and the government‘s silence in response to calls for information prompted calls to boycott the Beijing Winter Olympics in February, a high-profile event for the Communist Party.

The women’s professional tour threatened to pull events out of China unless the safety of the former No.1 doubles player was assured.

Discussion of Peng’s accusation has been removed from websites in China.

A government spokesperson on Friday denied knowing about the outcry.

The ruling party’s internet filters also prevent most Chinese from seeing other social media overseas and most global media.

Comments on Chinese social media on Sunday criticized the Women’s Tennis Association and others who spoke about Peng, while Chinese comments on Twitter mocked the awkward posting of photos and videos.

“When will the WTA come out of China?” Said a comment on social media service Sina Weibo, signed “Sleep Time.”

Peng joins the growing number of Chinese businessmen, activists and ordinary people who have disappeared in recent years after criticizing party figures or as part of cracking down on corruption or campaigning for democracy and labor rights.

Some reappear weeks or months later without an explanation, suggesting that they are warned not to reveal that they were detained or the reason.

The editor-in-chief of the Global Times party newspaper, Hu Xijin, wrote on Twitter on Saturday that Peng was “freely staying at home” and “would appear in public and participate in certain activities soon.”

The tennis stars and the WTA have been unusually vocal in demanding information on Peng. Other companies and sports groups are reluctant to take on Beijing for fear of losing access to the Chinese market or other reprisals.

The ruling party has given no indication whether it is investigating Peng’s accusation against Gao, 75, who left the Standing Committee in 2018 and has largely disappeared from public life.

Even if Peng’s charge is held to be valid, the Chinese are often jailed or face other penalties for embarrassing the party by posting abuse complaints instead of going through the secretive and often callous official system.

The status of star athletes like Peng is particularly sensitive. State media are celebrating their victories as proof that the party is making China strong. But the party is vigilant to ensure that it cannot use its notoriety and public appeal to erode its image.

Steve Simon, president and CEO of the WTA, expressed concern for Peng’s safety after Hu posted two videos on Saturday that appeared to show her in a restaurant.

“Although it is positive to see her, it is still unclear whether she is free and capable of making decisions and acting on her own, without coercion or outside interference. This video alone is insufficient,” Said Simon. “Our relationship with China is at a crossroads.



Source link

Home Office ‘hides’ its own study on why refugees come to UK | Immigration and asylum

0

The Home Office is covering up its own research into why refugees and asylum seekers come to the UK because ministers “know their arguments don’t hold up,” charities say.

Authorities are refusing to disclose evidence as to whether so-called ‘pull factors’ play a role in asylum seekers traveling to the UK.

Thursday, Deputy Prime Minister Dominic Raab Talk about “Reducing the pull factor” in an attempt to justify the government’s controversial plans for offshore asylum processing centers in Albania. Home Secretary Chris Philp asserted that accepting asylum seekers who have traveled across Europe “creates a pull factor where migrants are incentivized to undertake dangerous and illegal journeys”.

Yet when the Home Office was asked to provide evidence to back up his claims, he refused. A Freedom of Information response dated October 28 said the material could not be released because it was “likely to interfere with the free and frank provision of advice and the free and frank exchange of views for any purpose. of deliberation “.

Sophie McCann, advocacy officer at Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) UK, accused ministers of knowing their arguments were unfounded. McCann said: “Ministers withhold evidence that is central to their argument about the need to target refugees and asylum seekers with inhumane ‘deterrence’ measures.

“The ministers refuse to disclose the evidence they have on the existence or not of such a pull factor.

McCann added, “The reality is that the ‘pull factors’ are a myth – people fleeing persecution or conflict need no additional incentive to seek safety. It’s hard to see why the government would refuse to share evidence that supports its plans – the only conclusion to be drawn is that they know their arguments don’t hold up.

Previous Home Office research on asylum seekers’ decision-making seems to undermine the pull factor argument in favor of tougher policies. He said: “They [asylum seekers] are guided more by officers, the presence or absence of family and friends, language and perceived cultural affinities than by a careful examination of asylum policies or a rational evaluation of the social benefits offered.

It follows a report by the Refugee Council last week which highlighted misleading statements about asylum seekers by Home Secretary Priti Patel.

The analysis, based in part on data from the Home Office, shows that nearly two-thirds of people crossing the Channel in small boats are considered genuine refugees and allowed to stay – contradicting claims by Patel that 70% of small boat arrivals “are not genuine”. asylum seekers”.

More than 23,000 people have arrived in the UK this year in small boats, almost three times the total of around 8,500 in 2020. But the total number of arrivals is still relatively small, certainly compared to the number. almost 20 years ago, when UK asylum claims reached 84,132.

Still, there are signs that the issue is turning into a political headache for Boris Johnson and Patel. The Home Secretary has staked her reputation on reducing arrivals by boat, but also seems unwilling to allow refugees to continue to travel to the UK.

Experts also say boat arrivals have increased largely because the government has closed other entry routes, such as ferries, due to heightened security measures.

Meanwhile, more than 100 leaders of human rights and anti-slavery groups will write to lawmakers this week urging them to remove or change parts of Patel’s border bill to avoid consequences. ” catastrophic ”for victims of human trafficking. The bill, currently under consideration in parliament, is designed to address concerns about asylum, but its provisions will also make sweeping changes to the way modern slavery is approached. The letter argues that the amalgamation of the two will have “unintended negative consequences” for victims of trafficking and slavery and undermine the UK’s position as a world leader in addressing this issue.

Tamara Barnett of the Human Trafficking Foundation, who coordinated the joint letter: “This bill will lead to fewer prosecutions against real criminals, while those who really need support, including children, will be rejected by the new system. . Members of Parliament urgently need to amend this bill before it is too late.

A spokesperson for the Interior Ministry said: “The Nationality and Borders Bill will fix the failing asylum system so that it is fair but firm, helping those who really need it, while stopping those who abuse the system. “



Source link

Kennel plan among the latest Sedgemoor applications

0

BELOW are the planning requests received by Sedgemoor District Council between November 4-10, 2021.

For more details and to comment on the nominations, log on to www.sedgemoor.gov.uk/planning.

PURITON

95/21/00001: Land At Former, Royal Ordnance Factory (Gravity), Woolavington Road, Puriton, Bridgwater, Somerset, TA7 8AD: Consultation on the draft local development ordinance by gravity

BADWORTH

03/21/00021: Poplar Cottage, Bristol Road, Tarnock, Axbridge, Somerset, BS26 2SL: Conversion of the existing store into an annex and erection of the first floor extension above, with the installation of the front (North ) and from the back (South) dormer windows and balcony Lateral juilet (East).

BRIDGWATER

08/21/00151: 9 York Buildings, Bridgwater, Somerset, TA6 3BS: Installation of 1no. interior illuminated sign at southwest elevation.

08/21/00153: Units 13 and 14, Angel Place Shopping Center, High Street, Bridgwater, Somerset, TA6 3TQ: Change of use of the reception center (Sui Generis) to commercial, commercial and service use (Class E ).

8/21/00154: 4 Somerset Road, Bridgwater, Somerset, TA6 5NT: Erection of a one-story front (north) porch and replacement of the existing rear (south) shed roof. In addition, with changes to the rear (south) openings and a new rendering finish to the existing extension.

08/21/00168: 12 Taunton Road, Bridgwater, Somerset, TA6 3LS: Reduce the height and spread of the yew (T1) by 2m and raise the crown to a height of 2m above the level of the ground. Crown elevation group (G1) of 3 redwood stems to give 6m clearance from ground level to mitigate conflicts with windows.

8/21/00159: Unit B1a, Bridgwater Retail Park, The Leggar, Bridgwater, Somerset, TA6 4AB: Front elevation changes (south) including removal of existing canopy.

BRIDGWATER WITHOUT

09/21/00031: Land North of Express Business Park, Bristol Road, Bridgwater, Somerset, TA6: Building Permit Condition 2 Variations 09/20/00017 (Proposed job development including erection of 3 buildings (Use Class B2 and B8) and all associated land, site levels, parking, access and engineering, landscaping and drainage works.) To expand plot P1 to provide additional storage.

09/21/00003: Land east of, M5 Motorway, Horsey Lane, Bridgwater, Somerset, TA7: Construction of a gantry workshop building.

BURNHAM & GRAND PONT

11/21/00113: 224 Berrow Road, Burnham On Sea, Somerset, TA8 2JF: Request to determine if pre-approval is required for the erection of a rear veranda (north).

ALLERTON CHAPEL

15/21/00030: Stone Allerton Farm, Stone Allerton Drove, Stone Allerton, Axbridge, Somerset, BS26 2NR: Side porch erection (SW) and modifications of existing rear extension (NO), with installation of rear Juliet (NO) balcony and reverse doorman.

CHEDDAR

17/21/00098: Land west of, Quarry Farm, Nyland Drove, Nyland, Cheddar, Somerset: Retention of land elevation in the old riverbed for agricultural purposes after use: a permit from construct retrospective is requested for land elevation of a 187m section of dry river bed using up to 40% imported inert materials and 60% waste generated from the construction of agricultural tracks and the development of farm buildings on Stonebridge and Decoy Pool Farms. The total volume of backfill is approximately 3600 cubic meters. Land reclamation was fully completed at the end of 2020. The land has since been rolled over and 50% of it sown for agricultural production.

17/21/00067: Mendip House, Union Street, Cheddar, Somerset, BS27 3NA: Change in use of storage room (Class A1) to Residential for use as a guest room.

COSSINGTON

21/21/00013: 9 Station Road, Cossington, Bridgwater, Somerset, TA7 8JZ: Erection of one story side (south) and rear (west) extensions.

EASTERN BRENT

24/21/00033: Unit 5, Mill Batch Farm, Bristol Road, East Brent, Highbridge, Somerset, TA9 4JN: Proposed subdivision and refurbishment of existing industrial unit to form 3no. smaller industrial units.

EAST HUNT SPILL

25/21/00035: Brent Farm, New Road, East Huntspill, Highbridge, Somerset, TA9 3QA: Land use change associated with dog exercise area and construction of a building for kennels.

GOATHURST

29/21/00009: Tower House, 2 Halswell Park, Goathurst, Bridgwater, Somerset, TA5 2DH: Conversion of a loft into accommodation and modifications.

29/21/00010: Tower House, 2 Halswell Park, Goathurst, Bridgwater, Somerset, TA5 2DH: Conversion of a loft into accommodation and modifications.

LYMPHAM

31/21/00027: The Retreat, North Road, Lympsham, Weston-super-mare, Somerset, BS24 0HS: Proposed creation of a kidney shaped pond with surrounding fence.

MEDIUM-ZOY

34/21/00008: Land east of, Back Lane, Middlezoy, Bridgwater, Somerset, TA7: 26no erection. housing, ancillary open space, drainage, landscaping and associated infrastructure.

NIL STOWEY

36/21/00025: Quantock side, 64 South Lane, Nether Stowey, Bridgwater, Somerset, TA5 1LR: Reduce the height of the Macrocarpa tree (T1) to 2m overlooking the garden and neighboring outbuildings.

NORTH-PETERTON

37/21/00135: Land southwest of Stockmoor Distributor Road and northwest of Taunton Road, North Petherton, Bridgwater, Somerset: Request for EIA review notice for up to 500 dwellings, 4, 8 hectares of job development, a C2 care home (approximately 66 beds) and associated road, drainage and green infrastructure.

37/21/00125: Bridge Farm Barn, Petherton Road, North Newton, Bridgwater, Somerset, TA7 0BB: Erection of a two-story extension to the front elevation (north), installation of new windows and a drink.

37/21/00121: 7 Rhyne Bridge, Taunton Road, Bridgwater, Somerset, TA6 6LE: Erection of 2no. housing with associated garages and parking lots.

OTHER

38/21/00025: Amaric House, Fore Street, Othery, Bridgwater, Somerset, TA7 0QS: Erection of a wood frame one story carport on the side elevation (SW).

38/21/00024: Folly Barn, North Lane, Othery, Bridgwater, Somerset, TA7 0QG: Retrospective application for the conversion of an existing triple garage / carport into secondary accommodation.

PURITON

42/21/00029: Flat 1, 2 Rye, Puriton, Bridgwater, Somerset, TA7 8BZ: Poplar (T1) Crown lift Poplar at a height of 15m overlooking Middle Street. Monterey Cypress (T2) Reduce the crown by 2 m on branches grazing neighboring property and overhead cables.

WEDMORE

50/21/00110: Barn At, Totney Wick, Littlemoor Road, Mark, Highbridge, Somerset: Request to determine if pre-approval is required for the proposed change in use of the farm building at 1no. housing and associated construction operations.

50/21/00117: 29 St Medard Road, Wedmore, BS28 4AY: Reduce the Norwegian maple crown (T1) by 25% by shortening the side branches by 1.0m and 1.5m, thinning the branches crossed inside the crown.

50/21/00101: Coldnose House, Coldnose, Bagley, Wedmore, Somerset, BS28 4TG: Erection of two story extension to rear elevation (NW) and demolition of existing lean-to and garden store .

50/21/00092: Christmas Cottage, Pilcorn Street, Wedmore, Somerset, BS28 4AN: Retrospective request for the conservation of the existing conservatory.

50/21/00093: Christmas Cottage, Pilcorn Street, Wedmore, Somerset, BS28 4AN: Retrospective request for the conservation of the existing conservatory.

WEST HUNTSPILL

52/21/00022: 13 Silver Street, West Huntspill, Highbridge, Somerset, TA9 3RW: Construction of a garage connected to the existing workshop on the site of the existing garage to be demolished and pitched tiled roof.

52/21/00021: 12 Main Road, West Huntspill, Highbridge, Somerset, TA9 3DN: Construction of the extension on the first floor (NE) side above the existing garage, with the installation of roof windows and sliding doors on the existing rear extension (NO).

WESTONZOYLAND

53/21/00015: 2 Cranwell Close, Westonzoyland, Bridgwater, Somerset, TA7 0LH: Demolition of the perimeter wall and removal of the hedge with the erection of a new perimeter wall.


Source link

What the Newspaper Say – November 20

0

Migrants, mandatory Covid vaccinations and murderer Colin Pitchfork back in prison grab the headlines at the start of the weekend.

News Interior Minister Priti Patel wants Greek-style crackdown on migrants The daily telegraph, the newspaper reporting that people coming from across the Channel to the UK will be held in purpose-built centers and forced to obey strict rules or lose their asylum rights.

While The temperature said Prime Minister Boris Johnson was looking for a “solution” to the problem and worried “that there are still no viable policies to reduce the number of Channel crossings”.

Elsewhere, the FT weekend says Austria will make vaccinations mandatory as cases increase across Europe.

And the Daily mail leads with an investigation claiming a former school principal runs an anti-vaccination group that has been picketing schools.

The Guardian carries a suggestion that the rejection of multiculturalism by ‘successive governments’ has helped fuel racism similar to that faced by cricketer Azeem Rafiq, according to a former chairman of the Commission on the Future of Multiethnic Britain .

The independent leads on a report suggesting that vulnerable families and retirees will put 18 months of pressure on their finances, caused by the rising cost of living.

The Daily Mirror covers Colin Pitchfork – a double murderer who had been released on license – being returned to prison “amid fears about his behavior”.

Brits splashing money on Christmas lead the Daily Express, with the paper claiming the ‘spending spree’ will amount to £ 85 billion.

And the Star of the day says “bedwetting” has lost a battle to keep Benny Hill’s “naughty shows” from being shown on television.

https://twitter.com/dailystar/status/1461819470150782978



Source link